|
|
|
||
Category | Western | Theatrical Trailer(s) | Yes, 1 - 2.35:1 (Non-16x9), Dolby Digital 2.0 |
Rating | Other Trailer(s) | None | |
Year Released | 1964 | Commentary Tracks | None |
Running Time |
(Not 90 Minutes as per packaging) |
Other Extras | Menu Audio & Animation
Booklet |
RSDL/Flipper | No/No |
|
|
Start Up | Menu | ||
Region | 2,4 | Director | Sergio Leone |
Studio
Distributor |
20th Century Fox |
Starring | Clint Eastwood
Marianne Koch Gian Maria Volonté Wolfgang Lukschy Sieghardt Rupp Joseph Egger |
Case | Amaray | ||
RRP | $34.95 | Music | Dan Savio |
|
|
||
Pan & Scan/Full Frame | None | MPEG | None |
Widescreen Aspect Ratio | 2.35:1 | Dolby Digital | 2.0 |
16x9 Enhancement | Soundtrack Languages | English (Dolby Digital 2.0 mono, 256Kb/s) | |
Theatrical Aspect Ratio | 2.35:1 |
|
|
Macrovision | ? | Smoking | Yes |
Subtitles | English
English for the Hearing Impaired |
Annoying Product Placement | No |
Action In or After Credits | No |
After watching For A Few Dollars More, I was looking forward to telling you about another film in which the canned feel of the acting and effects is made up for with strong characterizations and convincing execution. Sadly, this is not the case, and the film has a tendency to scream its B-grade heritage at a glass-shattering volume, especially when actors other than Clint Eastwood and Gian Maria Volonté, who also appeared in For A Few Dollars More, are speaking. This is not to say that director Sergio Leone doesn't deserve credit for the efforts he put in, but the crudeness of the techniques used to make the film certainly mean that the film has not aged well. Another detail that seems absurd is the R classification of this film, as I have seen films with far more violence and blood in them get away with the decidedly pedestrian M rating. In any case, sit down, put your feet up, and enjoy this classic tale of Colonial mercenaries.
The colour saturation is as accurate as the age of the film and the limitations of colour processing in the year the film was produced would allow. Many tones had a look of being too rich for their own good, whereas others seemed to be slightly on the dull side, giving the film a similar look to old television programs that were made in the early days of colour. MPEG artefacts were absent from the transfer, although some shots simply didn't have the resolution to make them apparent in the first place. Film-to-video artefacts consisted of minor aliasing that occasionally became moderate in shots that contained a number of fine lines, with much of the Colonial-styled architecture showing a noticeable shimmer. On the positive side, the shimmering that did occur was far less distracting in this film than it was in For A Few Dollars More. Film artefacts, however, picked up the slack for the other two varieties, with all sorts of ugly spots and blemishes making themselves known in a great number of shots. One wide shot of San Miguel contained so many black marks that it appeared to be raining after a nuclear bombing in Italy.
The score music in this particular film is credited to one Dan Savio, although it does not essentially sound any different from the sequel that is credited to Ennio Morricone. The only real difference is that the score in this particular film is much more low-key in its approach and instrumentation, obviously a reflection of the smaller budget and looser production values. The presence of the score music was also quite reduced, with the music only being present for a total that would be doing well to reach half of the film's length, to say nothing of the amount of the score music that was actually noticeable. The limited fidelity of the soundtrack does not help matters any, with dialogue and music emanating from the same speaker in a fashion that sees sounds competing with one another for space in the minuscule surround field.
Again, there was no surround presence to speak of due to the monophonic mix, making the film seem ever more ancient in spite of the wonders of the format. Of course, the surround field is addled by pops and fuzz in the lower levels of the mix, the presence of which seems to vary according to the point in the film one is viewing. In the final stages of the film, a humming similar to the improper connection of an electric bass guitar to an amplifier can be heard, and the frequency of that rather noticeable popping increases quite noticeably. The rear channels were more or less completely silent, and the subwoofer only added a very slight floor to an explosion about ninety minutes into the film, which was probably a mere redirection from the frontal channels. A noticeable difference in this film from its sequel is that the sound of men punching one another is more like the sound of a large piece of fruit, a watermelon just for the sake of argument, being hit with a cricket bat rather than pieces of wet leather being hit together.
The video quality is above average.
The audio quality is below average.
The extras are minimal.
Video | |
Audio | |
Extras | |
Plot | |
Overall |
|
|
DVD | Grundig GDV 100 D, using composite output; Toshiba SD-2109, using S-video output |
Display | Panasonic TC-29R20 (68 cm), 4:3 mode, using composite input; Samsung CS-823AMF (80 cm), 16:9 mode/4:3 mode, using composite and S-video inputs |
Audio Decoder | Built In (Amplifier) |
Amplification | Sony STR-DE835 |
Speakers | Panasonic S-J1500D Front Speakers, Philips PH931SSS Rear Speakers, Philips FB206WC Centre Speaker, JBL Digital 10 Subwoofer |