Scream Screen Saga Boxed Set


Overall - Scream-Scream 2 - Scream 3 - Extras Disc

    The Scream Screen Saga boxed set is a collection of the three diminishing horror films that originally revived the slasher genre, then proceeded to sink it once more with two mediocre sequels. For further comments regarding the plots of each film, you can take a look at my plot synopses below. The first thing that one should know about this boxed set is that the three films contained within are transferred identically to the versions that have been available separately on retailer's shelves for the past three to twenty-odd months. The only significant difference lies in the extras disc, my summary of which you can read here. At a recommended retail price of $99.95, the boxed set might represent good value for determined completists, but the DVD of Scream in this boxed set is identical to the slipshod version of the film released by Magna Pacific a little while ago. If you're really determined to own all three Scream films and the extras disc contained therein, then I would advise buying this boxed set, and then importing the Japanese version of the original film while using the local version for a coffee coaster.
 
 

Overall Boxed Set Ratings
Video sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)
Audio sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)
Extras sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sgh.gif (874 bytes)
Plot sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sgh.gif (874 bytes)(Scream)
sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sgh.gif (874 bytes)(The other two films)
Overall sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)

Overall - Scream-Scream 2 - Scream 3 - Extras Disc

Scream

This review is sponsored by

BUY

Details At A Glance

General
Extras
Category Horror Menu Audio and Animation 
Theatrical Trailer (1.33:1, Dolby Digital 2.0) 
Featurette - Behind The Scenes (10:43) 
Featurette - Director's Comments (2:58) 
Untitled Featurette (6:11) 
Cast & Crew Interviews 
Music Video - unnamed: Drop Dead Gorgeous (3:41)
Rating ma.gif (1236 bytes)
Year Released 1996
Running Time
106:35 Minutes 
(Not 111 Minutes as per packaging) 
RSDL/Flipper RSDL (76:46)
Cast & Crew
Start Up Menu
Region 4 Director Wes Craven
Studio
Distributor
Miramax.gif (2746 bytes)
Magna Pacific
Starring Neve Campbell 
David Arquette 
Courtney Cox 
Matthew Lillard 
Rose McGowan 
Skeet Ulrich 
Jamie Kennedy 
Drew Barrymore
Case Click
RPI Individual Disc: $34.95
Boxed Set: $99.95
Music Marco Beltrami

 
 
Video
Audio
Pan & Scan/Full Frame Pan & Scan English (Dolby Digital 2.0, 192 Kb/s)
Widescreen Aspect Ratio None
16x9 Enhancement No
Original Aspect Ratio 2.35:1
Miscellaneous
Macrovision ? Smoking No
Subtitles None Annoying Product Placement Yes, moderately
Action In or After Credits Yes, some rather nice cast pictures during credits

Plot Synopsis

    Back in the early-to-mid 1990s, the horror genre was in something of a shambles because the genre was being flooded with endless recyclings of the same plot by the most mediocre directors in the business. Indeed, the fourth film in the previously much-loved Hellraiser genre was such an abomination that the director, whose real name I will not sully by repeating here, successfully applied for the Alan Smithee alias on the grounds that the film he thought he was making bore no relation to the finished edit. The classic Nightmare On Elm Street series had (finally) filmed its last episode, having gone from a film in which the villain was one of the scariest, creepiest things ever seen on the silver screen to a regurgitator of poor puns. The Friday The 13th series, described by one critic whom I normally severely disagree with as "the ultimate in recycling", had just filmed what we are still hoping against hope is the final episode. Then, in 1996, writer Kevin Williamson's pet project, Scary Movie, was released unto the public under the name Scream, with the great Wes Craven at the director's helm. Featuring the old Nightmare On Elm Street trademark of a strong female protagonist, as well as the Last House On The Left trademark of unbearable intensity (at least until the censors got hold of it), Scream gave the horror-thriller genre a much-needed revival.

    Yet, for such a celebrated horror film, the story is actually quite a simple one. It begins with Casey Becker (Drew Barrymore) receiving a phone call from a stranger, during which she is questioned about her knowledge of "scary movies" as the killer, voiced by Roger L. Jackson, puts it. One of the most clever in-jokes of this film is Casey's claim that the first Nightmare On Elm Street is good, but the others sucked. This is not just a display of self-indulgent wankery on the part of Wes Craven, who directed A Nightmare On Elm Street and then sold the rights to the franchise before it was a hit. It was his way of striking back at the sequels that took his cleverly-researched idea and ran it into the ground (although he did have some input into the third episode of the series). Casey is then killed by a figure in a black robe and a goofy Halloween mask, which surprised a lot of the audiences when the film was exhibited on the silver screen. After all, Barrymore was one of the screen's biggest crowd pullers a few years beforehand, and in many minds the idea of featuring her name on the theatrical poster only to kill her off in the first reel was too ridiculous to even contemplate. However, Kevin Williamson and Wes Craven obviously thought it was a better idea to kill off the most obvious choice for the film's hero and replace her with a complete surprise, a decision that they were a hundred percent correct with. Next, we are introduced to the actual hero of the movie, a young woman by the name of Sydney Prescott (Neve Campbell), whose mother was brutally raped and murdered a year prior to the film's setting.

    When Sydney learns what has happened to Casey, she is confronted by the possibility that the man she had sent to prison for her mother's murder may not be the killer after all. This thought is made all the more unpleasant by reporter Gale Weathers (Courtney Cox), who follows Sidney around and badgers her about the case until Sydney punches Gale's lights out in one of the most satisfying sequences of the film. For much of the film, Sydney is protected by her friends Stuart Macher (Matthew Lillard) and Tatum Riley (Rose McGowan), as well as Deputy Dwight Riley (David Arquette). For a significant portion of the film, we are left waiting for the next death instead of the story simply being moved along by solely by creative gore, and we even start to care about the less important characters that make up this film. However, when these characters (including some great uncredited cameos by Wes Craven, Linda Blair, and Henry Winkler) are killed one by one, Sydney finds herself confronted by her mother's killer, and surprised by their actual identity. Indeed, I was quite surprised by the way the film ended by sheer virtue of the fact that it doesn't follow your typical happy fairytale finale as dictated by what seems to be Hollywood convention.

    Obviously, this is not the most complex or original idea to come out of a horror film, but it is one that works surprisingly well for a number of reasons. The first is a clever script by Kevin Williamson, which works well both as a parody of the often self-recycling horror/slasher/thriller genre, and as a serious story in its own right. The second is some clever direction by Wes Craven, who also directed Shocker (the film Fallen sorely wishes that it was), with a number of false scares and witty references injected into the story both on a dialogue and visual level. However, the best thing about this film is the acting and the character development, especially from Neve Campbell, whose only previous appearances in horror films were in such productions as The Dark, and an abysmally written piece known as The Craft. The characters are engaging enough to carry the film on their own, unlike what happened in the two sequels, and the actors seem to be caring about their jobs rather than going through the motions as in the other Scream films.

    I was going to say that if you only buy one Scream film on DVD, buy this one, but Magna Pacific's treatment of this film leads me to recommend you buy none at all, unless you're interested in importing DVDs from Japan (see the R4 vs R2 vs R1 comparison below). Scream 2 may suffer from a mediocre script that severely hinders the actors, and Scream 3 was obviously rushed through production at the expense of plot development, but their DVD versions are far more preferable to look at.

Transfer Quality

Video

    I had been screaming out the question of why Scream 2 and Scream 3 have been available on DVD months and years in advance of the vastly superior original that they follow on from, calling for whomever owns the rights to Scream to bring this great film to our beloved format. Unfortunately, the treatment that Magna Pacific have given this DVD makes me wish I hadn't bothered.

    The transfer is presented in the Pan & Scanned aspect ratio of 1.33:1, and is not 16x9 enhanced. I didn't buy an eighty-centimeter television set with a selectable 16x9 mode so that I could watch Pan & Scan transfers of a film that appears on my list of most highly anticipated releases. Wes Craven is quite adept at composing for the ratio of 2.35:1, in spite of having only previously used it once, and I have even taken to calling Pan & Scan transfers of such films "half the film", i.e. "I'm watching Scream right now, well, half of it".

    The transfer is sharp, but not nearly as sharp as we have every right to expect from the DVD Video format, and even looks somewhat soft in comparison to the noticeably overcompressed Scream 2. While the backgrounds are not as soft and ill-defined, the foregrounds have a certain haze that looks halfway between an all-digital transfer and a recycled VHS master. Adding to this is the fact that panning shots lose a great deal of definition, with any camera movement reducing the resolution in direct proportion to its speed. The pitch of the audio made me repeat several shots in slow motion in order to check for that once-a-second judder, but it didn't seem to be there. I will expand on this point later. The shadow detail of the transfer is good, although I felt that it could have been slightly better. There is no low-level noise in the transfer, and a virtual absence of grain.

    The colour saturation of this transfer appears to be somewhat on the muted and dull side. Having seen this film on VHS a while ago, I felt that the colours in both formats suffered the same problem, in that the greens are not really green, and the reds are not really red. However, flesh tones look natural, and there is little evidence of bleeding or misregistration.

    MPEG artefacts were not especially prevalent in the transfer, but watching the film in slow motion to check for judder revealed that there is a moderate problem with motion blur. A camera pan across a brick wall soon dissolved into a blurry mess, and it doesn't take much distance from the camera to lose the sharpness that was somewhat incomplete to begin with in the foreground. Film-to-video artefacts consisted of some aliasing in fine lines, but this artefact was quite well-controlled, all things considered. Film artefacts were also a very well-controlled artefact, with only a handful of black marks appearing in the entire feature.

    This disc is presented in the RSDL format, with the layer change taking place at 76:46, between Chapters 11 and 12. Given that this is right in the middle of the sequence in which Sidney discovers the identity of the murderer, I could think of a number of better places to put the layer change. The fact that the music pauses noticeably during this layer change does not help matters.

Audio

    You know an audio transfer is in trouble when you can honestly say that the VHS cassette you viewed a few years ago had more life and channel usage than a current-generation DVD version. Now, as most regular readers of this site are well aware, when it comes to transferring a film into the PAL format and retaining the correct pitch, there are two basic options. One is to play the twenty-fourth frame in each second of the film twice, which results in a completely intolerable artefact known as judder. The other method is to digitally process the film's soundtrack, which in essence shifts the pitch down a semitone in order to compensate for the rise that results from the four percent speedup caused by playing back twenty-five frames in the same space where there should be twenty-four. A hard look at several panning shots for signs that the first method has been used failed to turn up any results, and there is more concrete evidence that the latter option has been used in the form of occasional pitch-shift related distortions.

    There is only one soundtrack on this DVD: the original English dialogue in Dolby Digital 2.0 Stereo. This is simply pathetic, as the VHS version of the film was quite heavily encoded to take advantage of the somewhat limited surround space offered by the Pro-Logic format. Much of this film contains opportunities to spread creepy, haunting, and disturbing sounds throughout the soundfield, truly engulfing the viewer in the action. All of these classic opportunities have been passed up in favour of a transfer that defies any notion of regard to the people who have been waiting for this film to arrive for countless months. Thankfully, the dialogue is always clear and easy to make out, although some limitations are posed upon this by the channel constriction at times. Furthering my theory that this soundtrack has been processed in order to compensate for the effects of PAL's speedup is the fact that much of the speech in the film seems out of sync by a very small percentage of a second.

    The score music in this film is credited to Marco Beltrami, although the contemporary music used in the film, including that distinctly ordinary Nick Cave number, has much more presence. This can be partly blamed on the fact that the makers of the film obviously went to a lot of trouble to make sure that the record company affiliate's picks of the moment got their thirty-second ad spot, but it also has to do with the timing of the score in combination with the limitations of the soundtrack. The lack of any separation between the music, sound effects, and dialogue means that all three elements have to fight very hard for ease of listening, and the score music is the big loser. This is not to say that the score doesn't slot into place within the overall composition of the film, but the odds are quite stacked against it when it comes to making an impact.

    Being that this is a straight stereo soundtrack, there is no usage of the surround channels, which is just criminal when the number of sound effects that would be quite stunning in the proper format is taken into account. Thankfully, the subwoofer was still present to add something of a bottom end to some sound effects, but its timing seemed to be just a little off.

Extras

    All the extras in the world cannot make up for the complete disregard shown towards the virtues of the format.

Menu

    The menu contains some animation and audio, but does little to build anything resembling an atmosphere. The between-menus animation is so haphazard that it will give you a painful jolt to view and listen to it.

Theatrical Trailer (1:57)

    Presented in an aspect ratio of 1.33:1 with Dolby Digital 2.0 sound, this is a passable two-minute theatrical trailer.

Featurette - Behind The Scenes

   Presented in what appears to be Full Frame, with a Dolby Digital 2.0 soundtrack, this is little more than a string of cursory shots from behind the camera.

Featurette - Director's Comments

    This is basically a three-minute interview with director Wes Craven, presented Full Frame with Dolby Digital 2.0 sound. A poor substitute for the commentary that appears on the Region 1 version of the disc.

Untitled Featurette

    Another Full Frame featurette with Dolby Digital 2.0 sound, the fact that the DVD's authors were too lazy to even give it a title should say it all.

Cast Interviews

    A sub-menu containing interviews with Skeet Ulrich, Neve Campbell, Rose McGowan, Matthew Lillard, and Drew Barrymore, in which each of them answer three lame questions.

Music Video: Drop Dead Gorgeous (3:41)

    The fact that the authors forgot to put the band's name in this video is very revealing. The video is presented Full Frame with Dolby Digital 2.0 sound.

R4 vs R2 vs R1

    Several versions of this film exist on DVD, Laserdisc, and VHS around the world, because this film was unfairly butchered by censors everywhere. Director Wes Craven complained in one interview for Ralph magazine that the MPAA kept specifically targeting the intensity of the film, saying "this section is just too intense", with a blatant and idiotic disregard for the fact that a horror director's primary job is to create intense moments. I am therefore also going to list the features of the Japanese Region 2 version of this disc for reasons which will become apparent shortly:
 
Region
Region 4 (Australia) 
Region 2 (Japan) 
Region 1 Dimension Collector's Edition (USA) 
Aspect Ratio 1.33:1 (Pan & Scan) 2.35:1 (16x9 Enhanced) 2.35:1 (Not 16x9 Enhanced)
Sound Format
(Original Dialogue)
Dolby Digital 2.0 Dolby Digital 5.1 Dolby Digital 5.1
Video Format PAL NTSC NTSC
Casing Soft Brackley CD Jewel Case Amaray
Edit MA-rated cut (equivalent to USA R-rated cut) Director Wes Craven's preferred cut, restoring the intensity of five murder sequences USA R-rated cut, with five key murder sequences toned down
Extras English Menus 
Theatrical Trailer 
Cast & Crew Interviews 
Production Featurettes 
Music Video
Production Featurette 
Theatrical Trailers (in Japanese
TV Spots (in Japanese
Behind-the-scenes footage 
Cast & Crew Interviews 
Cast Biographies 
Film Trivia 
Japanese Menus
Audio Commentary by Wes Craven and Kevin Williamson
Production Featurette 
Theatrical Trailers (in English) 
English Menus
Transfer Quality
(According To Reviews)
Watchable, but little different in quality terms from a laserdisc or VHS copy, with haze in the foreground and resolution loss in backgrounds and panning shots Issues with "extensive grain" and resultant minor pixelization, as well as small amounts of aliasing; still preferable to the R1 and UK R2 versions according to DVD Debate Rather diffuse due to the lack of 16x9 Enhancement, with pixelization in light and solid colours, as well as some colour bleeding and more noticeable aliasing; backgrounds taking on a "frozen" look, which may be compression-related

    To cut a very long story short, the Region 4 version of this disc is a loser and should be avoided like the plague. The Japanese Region 2 version of the disc is by far the best version simply because it is mostly immune from all the shortcomings of the other versions. It might be expensive and hard to get hold of, but if you really must have this film, it is hands down the only version of this film worth owning for the time being. If you're on a tight budget, buying the Region 1 Dimension Collector's Edition also makes sense in spite of the absurd censorship and lack of 16x9 Enhancement.

Summary

    Scream is one of the better pieces of work on Wes Craven's resume, but it is left in the dust by A Nightmare On Elm Street or Last House On The Left. The DVD presentation is simply unacceptable in its present form, and has only succeeded in destroying the enjoyment I had previously been able to derive from this film. We are being short-changed in the extreme here. Sorry, Magna Pacific, but this is not how you put together a transfer of such a heavily demanded film!

    The video quality may have been acceptable (just) on VHS, but it is quite unacceptable on DVD.

    The audio quality is (just) reasonable, but strongly suggests some kind of digital pitch alteration.

    The extras have that telltale ring of desperation.
 
 

Ratings (out of 5)

Video star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green_half.gif (874 bytes)
Audio star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)
Extras star_red.gif (100 bytes)
Plot star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green_half.gif (874 bytes)
Overall star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green_half.gif (874 bytes)

© Dean McIntosh (my bio sucks... read it anyway)
November 3, 2000.
 

Review Equipment
   
DVD Grundig GDV 100 D, using composite output; Toshiba SD-2109, using S-video output
Display Panasonic TC-29R20 (68 cm), 4:3 mode, using composite input; Samsung CS-823AMF (80 cm), 16:9 mode/4:3 mode, using composite and S-video inputs
Audio Decoder Built In (Amplifier)
Amplification Sony STR-DE835
Speakers Yamaha NS-45 Front Speakers, Philips PH931SSS Rear Speakers, Philips FB206WC Centre Speaker, JBL Digital 10 Active Subwoofer


Overall - Scream-Scream 2 - Scream 3 - Extras Disc

Scream 2

This review is sponsored by

BUY

Details At A Glance

General
Extras
Category Horror/Thriller Theatrical Trailer - 1.33:1 (16x9 Enhanced), Dolby Digital 2.0
Cast Biographies
Rating
Year Released 1997
Running Time 115:43 Minutes
(Not 120 Minutes as per packaging) 
RSDL/Flipper No/No
Cast & Crew
Start Up Movie
Region 4 Director Wes Craven
Studio
Distributor

Roadshow Home Entertainment
Starring David Arquette 
Neve Campbell 
Courtney Cox 
Sarah Michelle Gellar 
Jamie Kennedy 
Laurie Metcalf 
Jerry O'Connell 
Jada Pinkett 
Liev Schreiber
Case Brackley
RPI Individual Disc: $34.95
Boxed Set: $99.95
Music Marco Beltrami

 
 
Video
Audio
Pan & Scan/Full Frame No English (Dolby Digital 5.1)
English (MPEG 2.0 )
Widescreen Aspect Ratio 2.35:1
16x9 Enhancement
Theatrical Aspect Ratio 2.35:1
Miscellaneous
Macrovision Yes Smoking No
Subtitles None Annoying Product Placement No
Action In or After Credits No

Plot Synopsis

    Before the great David Bowie hit his all-time low in the 1980s, he recorded a great song about one of his most well-known personas, Major Tom, being strung out and in the depths of what he was about to experience, that well-lamented all-time low. In case you're wondering what the point of me describing this to you is, I firmly believe that director Wes Craven would do well to use Bowie as a negative example and give up before he tarnishes the reputation he used to have any further. In other words, it makes me rather sad to see that the same man who wrote and directed such great horror films as The Serpent And The Rainbow and A Nightmare On Elm Street would allow himself to be associated with films like Scream 2. Scream was at least an interesting film with a sort of twist on the very much-maligned slasher film genre, although a lot of the script had a somewhat hackneyed and sophomoric feel to it, overall. Scream 2, on the other hand, contains a very hackneyed and sophomoric lot of expansive dialogue about the rules of making a sequel to a slasher movie written by none other than Wes Craven, who then forgets to follow his own rules. In case you're curious, the rules of a slasher sequel, according to Wes Craven and Kevin Williamson are as follows. First of all, the sequel in question must have a higher body count, and this rule is something which Scream 2 fails miserably. Second, the death scenes are supposed to be much more elaborate, and once again, Scream 2 does not make the grade.

    Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell) is now attending college and trying to put the past behind her in a location some distance from the site of the murders that made up the original Scream. As one does when they narrowly avoid being killed by someone they trusted quite deeply, one would think. One day, she wakes up to find that two seniors at the same educational institution have been murdered at the premiere of a film based on those murders, which is a stressful enough event to begin with, except for the added annoyance of constant hounding from the press. In particular, she is hounded by the reporter from the original Scream, one Gale Weathers (Courtney Cox), with her attempt to get an exclusive between Cotton Weary (Liev Schreiber) and Sidney gaining a less than positive response. Adding some flavouring to this mix of characters is the new mixture of victims and suspects, with reporter wannabe Debbie Salt (Laurie Metcalf) and Sidney's new squeeze, Derek (Jerry O'Connell) adding a tinge of the B-grade acting one would normally expect from a real slasher film. The role of Dewey Riley (David Arquette) is reprised, but really contributes very little to the overall film except for added tension between Gale and the rest of the characters. A pair of sorority sisters, Lois (Rebecca Gayheart) and Murphy (Portia De Rossi) add the predictable and useless red herring, and Tori Spelling keeps the quotient for the dogs you actually want to see killed, by playing herself playing Neve Campbell's character. Confused? Well, so am I after being expected to believe a rather attractive woman with few flaws would be portrayed in a movie within a movie by a woman for whom an unrequested fission surplus could actually constitute a makeover.

    This, not unnaturally, leads me to the question of why lame sequels are currently being brought out before their much-superior originals. First, Warner Brothers indulged us by bringing out both Mad Max sequels before the much more compelling original was given a chance to so much as gestate on DVD. Second, we had Columbia Tristar managing that trick by bringing us Robocop 3, which is undeniably the single worst sequel to one of the best films of the previous century. Now, Roadshow Home Entertainment have favoured us by bringing out Scream 2 (or Scam 2, as other fans of Wes Craven's actual good films that I know like to call it) before bringing us the moderately entertaining original. So this brings me to yet another law about which films get the best treatment on DVD: the crappy imitation is always brought out before the much more compelling bright idea. This law applies across all genres: Science Fiction (The Matrix before Tron), Sports Action (Futuresport before Rollerball), and even Christ-Theme based vengeance Action (The Crow before Robocop). Now that I have outlined another one of my beautifully asinine theories about what goes on in the minds of release schedulers, I hope you find the rest of the review just as enlightening. Let's dive right in...

Transfer Quality

Video

    This is a generally excellent transfer, and it would not surprise me to see the original Scream getting one that makes this film seem more bearable due to a better transfer. I have long been following Wes Craven's works on other formats, and this is one sound theory to go with after having seeing pseudo-digital remasters of A Nightmare On Elm Street and The Serpent And The Rainbow on a crazy computer-based projection system.

    This particular transfer is presented in the original theatrical aspect ratio of 2.35:1, complete with 16x9 Enhancement. This transfer appears to have been downconverted to the 16x9 shape rather than upconverted from an inferior source, as the resolution is very good, to the point of almost being too good. The transfer is immaculately sharp, making full use of the superior resolution that DVD offers. Shadow detail was excellent, even for a film of this recent vintage, and there was no low-level noise in this film at any time.

    The colour saturation was completely spot-on from start to finish, with all tones and hues coming up in a realistic and vibrant fashion. It almost made me want to crawl through my television screen and into the picture, the film appeared to be so very full of real life.

    MPEG artefacts were absent from the film, in spite of there being just over two hours of high-motion film on the one layer. Film-to-video artefacts, however, were a noticeable problem in the context of the original source material, but nothing that would disturb the casual viewer. The most noticeable examples occur on some chrome near windows, venetian blinds, Gail's clothing, and the usual moiré effect that can be found in your average photography of a television display. Gail's clothing in particular was a problematic source of aliasing, as it contains many fine lines that shimmer whenever she begins to move. Compared to some other transfers in this ratio that I could mention, this film is remarkably free of such artefacts. Film artefacts were more or less completely absent, except for the mid-way point of the film, which shows a small but noticeable amount for a few minutes.

    I just thought I should mention that there are absolutely no subtitles on this disc, which is rather annoying when you want to look for character names or exact spellings of locations.

Audio

    A choice of two soundtracks are available on this DVD, both of them in the original English: a Dolby Digital 5.1 soundtrack, which the disc has designated as the default, and an MPEG 2.0 surround-encoded soundtrack. I would have liked to have seen a Spanish or German dubbing, due to the somewhat artistic nature of the dialogue, but we'll have to make do with what we have. I listened to the Dolby Digital soundtrack, because this film really demands a full surround experience to begin with.

    The dialogue was generally clear and easy to understand for most of the film, but the odd word here and there was indistinct and hard to make out. This, however, was the fault of the actors rather than the people responsible for this transfer. There were no audio sync problems at any point in the transfer, which is remarkable considering the number of overdubbed telephone conversations.

    The score music of this film is credited to one Marco Beltrami, with a large number contemporary songs being used to fill out more sedate moments in the film. Personally, I hate the contemporary music that shows up in American films so much that I will severely lower my opinion of any film that uses it as anything more than a prop. Now if they used contemporary music from real artists on the other hand, things might change. In any case, the score music added a certain tense and strangely enveloping sound to the proceedings, without becoming anything too exciting.

    The surround channels are used in a borderline-heavy manner to support the music, occasional special effects, and some ambient sounds such as the low hum of the library. Unlike a lot of sound fields for films of this kind, it draws the viewer into the overall experience of the film and creates the illusion of actually being there, as a part of the onscreen events. The subwoofer was used in moderation to add some extra punch to some sequences, but otherwise did surprisingly little. It was rather effectively integrated into the overall mix, however, not giving itself away for one second.

Extras

    I've seen better, and I've seen worse. It really isn't the amount of space you allocate to extras, it is what you do with it that counts.

Menu

    The menu design is themed around the film, and remarkably easy to navigate compared to earlier Roadshow Home Entertainment efforts.

Theatrical Trailer

    Presented in the aspect ratio of 1.33:1, windowboxed with 16x9 Enhancement and Dolby Digital 2.0 sound that seemed to be mixed from a mono source.

Cast Biographies

    Limited biographies for Neve Campbell, David Arquette, Courtney Cox, Sarah Michelle Gellar, Jamie Kennedy, Jerry O'Connell, Jada Pinkett, and Liev Schreiber are provided. Nothing particularly interesting.

R4 vs R1

    The Region 1 version of this disc misses out on;     A 2.35:1 movie without 16x9 Enhancement (The Thing, anyone?). Says it all, really.

Summary

    Scream 2. Crap movie, wonderful DVD. Can we please stop it with the forced and moronic sequels, Hollywood?

    The video quality is excellent, and would have been reference material if not for some small, momentary problems.

    The audio quality is a shining example of how a film of this genre should sound.

    The extras are ordinary, but better than one would normally expect for a film like this.

Ratings (out of 5)

Video
Audio
Extras
Plot
Overall

© Dean McIntosh (my bio sucks... read it anyway)
May 2, 2000

Review Equipment
   
DVD Grundig GDV 100 D, using composite output; Toshiba SD-2109, using S-video output
Display Panasonic TC-29R20 (68 cm), 4:3 mode, using composite input; Samsung CS-823AMF (80 cm), 16:9 mode/4:3 mode, using composite and S-video inputs
Audio Decoder Built In (Amplifier)
Amplification Sony STR-DE835
Speakers Panasonic S-J1500D Front Speakers, Sharp CP-303A Back Speakers, Philips FB206WC Centre Speaker, JBL Digital 10 Subwoofer

Overall - Scream-Scream 2 - Scream 3 - Extras Disc

Scream 3

This review is sponsored by

BUY

Details At A Glance

General
Extras
Category Horror Audio Commentary: Wes Craven (Director), Marianne Maddalena (Co-Producer), Patrick Lussier (Editor)
Alternate Ending with commentary 
Deleted Scenes with commentary 
Outtakes 
Behind-The-Scenes montage 
Music Video: Creed - What If
Theatrical Trailers (2) 
Cast & Crew Biographies
Rating ma.gif (1236 bytes)
Year Released 2000
Running Time 111:48 Minutes
RSDL/Flipper RSDL (75:32)
Cast & Crew
Start Up Menu
Region 1,2,3,4,5,6 Director Wes Craven
Studio
Distributor
DimensionFilms.gif (1784 bytes)
Roadshow Home Entertainment
Starring Neve Campbell
David Arquette 
Courtney Cox Arquette 
Patrick Dempsey 
Scott Foley 
Lance Henriksen 
Jenny McCarthy 
Emily Mortimer 
Parker Posey 
Deon Richmond 
Patrick Warburton
Case Transparent Amaray
RPI Individual Disc: $34.95
Boxed Set: $99.95
Music Marco Beltrami

 
 
Video
Audio
Pan & Scan/Full Frame None English (Dolby Digital 5.1, 448 Kb/s) 
English (Dolby Digital 2.0 , 224 Kb/s) 
English Audio Commentary (Dolby Digital 2.0 , 224 Kb/s)
Widescreen Aspect Ratio 2.35:1
16x9 Enhancement
16x9Yes.jpg (4536 bytes)
Original Aspect Ratio 2.35:1
Miscellaneous
Macrovision Yes Smoking No
Subtitles English for the Hearing Impaired Annoying Product Placement No
Action In or After Credits Yes, the usual picture credits for the principal cast members

Plot Synopsis

    Scream was, much like any other film Wes Craven had previously directed, a very original horror film that has attracted imitators and outright piracy since its release in 1996. Of course, most of Craven's previous works hadn't been much to rave about, with the exception of A Nightmare On Elm Street, a film that has spawned so many inferior imitations that even the original couldn't quite survive critical malignment. Of course, Wes had the perfect excuse for the death of the Nightmare franchise: he'd sold the rights to the character before the film had become such a hit, thus relinquishing any creative control that he had. Unfortunately, he has no such excuse to fall back upon with the Scream franchise, which was somewhat overrated to begin with. The problems that the original Scream had with the MPAA turned it from a wicked horror story into something of a comedy, and Scream 2 tried so hard in vain to get a laugh that it became pathetic. Now that screenwriter Kevin Williamson has abandoned the franchise in favour of other projects, the producers thought that they could get Ehren Kruger, who only had previously written three films, all of them B-movies, to write the third and (hopefully) final episode. Wes Craven was not quite so lucky, being forced to direct this third episode in order to get backing for his pet project, Music Of The Heart, a fact that has been cleverly referenced at 32:46, when Stab 3's director complains about the manner in which he was obligated to direct the film.

    The real reason to see this film is to see what becomes of the real lead character of this film, Sidney Prescott (Neve Campbell), and much of this film goes by without her presence. The reason for this is that work obligations restricted Campbell's involvement in the film to twenty shooting days, which is certainly not a good thing to pile on top of the rushed script. Much of this rushed script is so clichéd and blasé that I began to feel I could have written a better horror film when I was ten years old. The film begins well enough, with a spree of murders taking place in Hollywood near the set of Stab 3, while Sidney is working as a counsellor for a women's crisis line. Unfortunately, the film takes a quick detour to Hollywood, where the lead actors on Stab 3 are being murdered by a serial killer who is also in possession of a vocal harmonizer that has the paradoxical ability to take the voice of whomever is speaking into it and make said voice sound like someone else. I don't care what plot excuse you come up with, a vocal effect that can take a voice and shift the pitch far enough to change its gender without distortion, as indicated during the murders, is not possible even with today's technology. The pointless raving of the killer at the moment where we learn his identity also severely hurts the film, making me scream out that I simply didn't care about this nonsense. Real murderers do not trumpet their reasons for the benefit of the audience. Most of them don't really know the reasons why they behave the way they do themselves.

    Now, it wasn't too long ago that I fitted into the teenaged audience this film is obviously aimed at, and I can tell you with some certainty that I cared a lot about such things as character and plot development. I cared about such things at a much earlier age, as a matter of fact, a time when I sat down and had a look at such films as Halloween and The Evil Dead. While the original Scream was a valiant effort to revive the ailing horror genre, I'm sorry to say that the two sequels, especially this one, have left it in an even weaker state than ever. There are some directors who can take a patently awful script and make the best of it, but this film makes it very clear that Wes Craven is no Paul Verhoeven. Maybe if the latter had written or directed this disappointment, things might have turned out a lot better.

Transfer Quality

Video

    Under my analysis, it always seems that when a series of films are transferred to DVD, the worst episodes will get the best transfer, and while some transfers have proven me wrong, the Scream trilogy is not one of them. With the eminently more watchable Scream having been released as a Pan & Scan transfer that is lacking in resolution, this episode adds insult to injury by being the best transfer of the series by a long margin.

    The transfer is presented in an aspect ratio of 2.35:1, and it is 16x9 Enhanced.

    The transfer is exceptionally sharp even when the combined photography and compression would normally lend itself to a diffuse look, clearly a benefit of the extra space provided by a second layer. Unlike Scream 2, which looked lifeless and flat on a single-layer DVD, this film looks even better on an RSDL DVD than it probably did on the silver screen. The shadow detail is impeccable, balancing itself between the darkness needed for horror films and the clarity needed for an enjoyable viewing experience without any problems. There was no low-level noise in any of the darker scenes, making me pity the fool that tries to view this film on VHS.

    Having read Rod's assessment of this transfer when the disc was originally released, I was specifically looking for problems with colour saturation, but failed to find any, at least relatively speaking. Just to make sure, I took a few looks at the suspect shot which occurs at 50:31, and only noticed the same emphasis of red that pervades the night-time sequences. There did not seem to be any problems with bleeding or undersaturation at any time in the feature.. Of interest, however, is the fact that many daytime scenes in the film have an overly rich saturation that the previous episodes in the series lacked, and this takes a lot of getting used to when you've grown used to the lifeless and dingy colour saturations of Wes Craven's previous horror films, A Nightmare On Elm Street being the best example.

    MPEG artefacts were not noticed at any point in the transfer, in spite of this disc being stuffed to the gills with variable-quality extras material. Film-to-video artefacts consisted of some occasional mild shimmer, but this artefact was not nearly as bad as it probably should have been. Film artefacts were completely non-existent, as you'd expect from a film as recent as this one.

    This disc is presented in the RSDL format, with the layer change taking place at 75:32. This is during a brief break in the dialogue, but it passed by more or less completely unnoticed on my setup, with only a slight hiccup in the sound effects being a clue to its location. It's nice to see that Village Roadshow are taking more care to hide their layer changes than merely inserting an artificial fade to black.

Audio

    The audio transfer is also by far the best of the Scream series, making me truly outraged that the original episode is presented in Dolby Digital 2.0, and without surround-encoding to boot. Those of you who took the time to send me your feedback after reading my open letter to the DVD Consortium will know the sort of feeling I am trying to describe. This is definitely my theory that the biggest letdowns in filmmaking get the most faultless transfers brought to its ultimate expression.

    The audio transfer provided for Scream 3 consists of three soundtracks: the original English dialogue rendered in Dolby Digital 5.1, at the higher rate of 448 kilobits per second, as well as a downmixed version of the original English dialogue in Dolby Digital 2.0 with surround-encoding, and finally a Dolby Digital 2.0 surround-encoded commentary track. I listened to all three soundtracks, but all the comments in this section relate to the Dolby Digital 5.1 mix. For some reason, the dialogue is mixed in a little low for this soundtrack, and the surround channels were unusually loud for a Dolby Digital soundtrack. In spite of this, the dialogue is generally quite easy to understand, with no clashes between the dialogue and the sound effects. Audio sync was never a problem, although some of the lines spoken when characters wander off-camera are quite obviously ADRed.

    Marco Beltrami is credited with the score music in this episode, but it really sounds as if it were simply recycled from the previous two films. Another slight problem was that the score music seemed to be trying to fill emotional gaps in the story, and failing. Maybe I have been watching too many films with orchestral scores, but I really found that this one failed to connect on any level. You know a score is in trouble when the lamentably tryhard Nick Cave is leaving more of an impression on the viewer than the orchestration.

    The surround channels were used to support a myriad of sound effects, such as flashbacks in the form of auditory hallucinations, but it seemed like too much effort was being made to divert attention from the fact that the film itself had no real story. If you enjoy the use of sound effects to draw you into the story being shown on-screen, you will be disappointed by this soundtrack. If, on the other hand, you enjoy having sounds blasted at you from all directions without adding anything to the story, then this is a fine soundtrack. There really seems to be little rhyme nor reason to the use of the surround channels, with the original monaural soundtrack of A Nightmare On Elm Street, which I have only seen on VHS so far, seeming to have more resonance. The subwoofer was limited to supporting the occasional explosion or piece of bass-heavy music, with the gunshots sounding more like popping corks than actual gunshots.

Extras

Menu

    The menu has an animated introduction that makes use of Dolby Digital 5.1 sound, as do the lower level menus. Personally, I found the manner in which the next menu option is highlighted when one returns to the menu rather annoying, as I found it to be quite counter-intuitive.

Audio Commentary - Wes Craven (Director), Marianne Maddalena (Producer), Patrick Lussier (Editor)

    Wes Craven speaks a lot about fascinating subjects relating to the production, such as the haphazard manner in which the film was conceived and put together, without specifically mentioning that the only reason he did this film was so that he'd get the nod to make his pet project. Patrick Lussier is difficult to discern from Wes Craven, except for a very slight difference (about a semitone higher) in pitch. Marianne Maddalena also has some very interesting things to say about the production, but overall, this is not a commentary I would return to in a hurry. I suspect that those who enjoy the film more will find this commentary more palatable, but you'll be hard pressed to find such people.

US Theatrical Trailer (1:17)

    Presented in the aspect ratio of 1.78:1, with 16x9 Enhancement and Dolby Digital 2.0 sound, this trailer does much worse than give away the whole film - it creates false promises regarding the quality of the feature. The picture quality is just fine, although somewhat on the dark side.

International Theatrical Trailer (1:34)

    Also presented in the aspect ratio of 1.78:1, with 16x9 Enhancement and Dolby Digital 2.0 sound, this trailer is accompanied by the usual annoying voiceover that also creates false promises regarding the quality of the feature. The picture is a little more diffuse than the US trailer, but otherwise fine.

Alternate Ending (9:43)

    This is more an alternative edit of the ending, and I can see why the version that appears in the final film flows so differently. Both endings are pretty annoying for various reasons, but this one, framed at 2.35:1 with 16x9 Enhancement with a choice of Dolby Digital 2.0 production sound or commentary, is worse. When this extra begins, we are quickly reminded that it was taken from a low-resolution video editing system, and the reasons why are quickly obvious.

Deleted Scenes - Scream 2 (4:12) and Scream 3 (13:37)

    Presented in the aspect ratio of 2.35:1, with 16x9 Enhancement and Dolby Digital 2.0 sound, these are more alternate edits than actual deleted scenes. Not very interesting ones at that. The Scream 3 deleted scenes come with a choice between production audio and commentary.

Music Video - Creed: What If (4:54)

    Get this pile of rubbish off my disc! The video tape source, Dolby Digital 2.0 sound, and 16x9 Enhanced 1.78:1 picture nonwidthstanding, I would like someone to explain to me once and for all how this lamentable imitation can sell when the real thing languishes on shelves unnoticed. Didn't Morrisey once urge people to come and see the real thing? Did they just ignore him, or did they neglect to do the same with their offspring? The picture quality is really as bad as the programme content (for once), with NTSC-to-PAL conversion and composite artefacts leaping up at the viewer with more clarity than the actual footage.

Outtakes - Scream (4:17) and Scream 2 (8:57)

    Taken from a similar low-resolution source to the other outtakes and deleted scenes on the disc, these outtakes are not funny. I suppose that might stem from the fact that I feel Scream 2 was Wes Craven's biggest mistake since selling the rights to A Nightmare On Elm Street. They are presented in the aspect ratio of 2.35:1 with 16x9 Enhancement and Dolby Digital 2.0 sound.

Featurette - Behind The Scenes Montage (6:18)

    Presented in the aspect ratio of 1.78:1, with 16x9 Enhancement and Dolby Digital 2.0, this is basically a collection of behind-the-scenes moments on the set of all three Scream films. One shot reveals just how much footage was arbitrarily cut from one scene in the original, making me add it to the list of films that need to be re-released in Director's Cut forms post-haste.

Cast & Crew Biographies

    Biographies are provided for Courtney Cox Arquette, Neve Campbell, David Arquette, and director Wes Craven. These are, to put it in modest terms, exceptionally comprehensive, and a vast improvement over previous VR biographies in the readability stakes.

R4 vs R1

    The Region 4 and Region 1 versions of this disc are fundamentally identical, although the Region 1 version is available in a boxed set with some extras placed on a fourth disc. Given that the original Scream is in its proper aspect ratio with this boxed set, it may be the better purchase if you're a determined completist, which is really the only market that this film appeals to.

Summary

    Scream 3 is a perfect example of why rushing a film to production with an incomplete script should be outlawed, and why forcing a director to make a film so that he can complete his pet project should be termed blackmail.

    The video quality is excellent.

    The audio quality is okay, but seems haphazardly put together, much like the film.

    The extras are comprehensive.

Ratings (out of 5)

Video star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)
Audio star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)
Extras star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)
Plot star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)
Overall star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)star_green.gif (100 bytes)

© Dean McIntosh (my bio sucks... read it anyway)
October 24, 2000.

Review Equipment
   
DVD Grundig GDV 100 D, using composite output; Toshiba SD-2109, using S-video output
Display Panasonic TC-29R20 (68 cm), 4:3 mode, using composite input; Samsung CS-823AMF (80 cm), 16:9 mode/4:3 mode, using composite and S-video inputs, calibrated using the NTSC DVD version of Video Essentials.
Audio Decoder Built In (Amplifier)
Amplification Sony STR-DE835, calibrated using the NTSC DVD version of Video Essentials.
Speakers Panasonic S-J1500D Front Speakers, Philips PH931SSS Rear Speakers, Philips FB206WC Centre Speaker, JBL Digital 10 Active Subwoofer

Overall Boxed Set - Scream-Scream 2 - Scream 3 - Extras Disc

The Scream Screen Saga: Special Features

This review is sponsored by

BUY

Details At A Glance

General
Extras
Category Extras Featurette - Behind The Scream (31:34)
Featurette - Screen Tests (7:46)
Featurette - Scream 2 (6:48)
Sunrise Studios Trailers (10)
Music Video - Master P: Scream (3:03)
DVD-ROM Extras - Trivia Game, Scripts, Character Web, SS, Web Site
Easter Egg - Scary Movie Trailer (2:26)
Crew Biographies
Rating ma.gif (1236 bytes)
Year Released 2000
Running Time Approx. 70 Minutes
RSDL/Flipper No/No
Cast & Crew
Start Up Menu
Region 1,2,3,4,5,6 Director Wes Craven
Studio
Distributor
DimensionFilms.gif (1784 bytes)
Roadshow Home Entertainment
Starring Neve Campbell
David Arquette 
Courtney Cox Arquette 
Patrick Dempsey
Case Transparent Amaray
RPI Boxed Set: $99.95 Music Marco Beltrami

 
 
Video
Audio
Pan & Scan/Full Frame None English (Dolby Digital 2.0)
Widescreen Aspect Ratio 2.35:1
16x9 Enhancement
16x9Yes.jpg (4536 bytes)
Original Aspect Ratio 2.35:1
Miscellaneous
Macrovision Yes Smoking No
Subtitles English for the Hearing Impaired Annoying Product Placement No
Action In or After Credits No

Plot Synopsis

    The Scream Screen Saga: Special Features can be categorized in the same class as the Alien Legacy disc that comes with the boxed set of the same name that is currently available from Fox Home Video. Presenting over seventy minutes of extras that would appeal mainly to die-hard fans of the series, the disc is only available with the Scream Screen Saga boxed set that Roadshow Home Entertainment are currently marketing. Those of you who have already bought the Region 4 editions of Scream 2 and Scream 3 will be better off giving this disc a miss, as it really adds very little to the overall experience of watching the films.

Extras

Menu

    The menu has an animated introduction that makes use of Dolby Digital 5.1 sound, as do the lower level menus. Personally, I found the manner in which the next menu option is highlighted when one returns to the menu rather annoying, as I found it to be quite counter-intuitive.

Featurette - Behind The Scream

    Consisting of the seven chapters Titles/Scary Movie, Casting, The Success, Production Notes, Scream 2: The Sequel, Scream 3: The Trilogy, and The Director, this thirty-one minute featurette details the making of each film in the saga. This featurette is presented Full Frame with Dolby Digital 2.0 sound.

Sunrise Studios Trailers

    A collection of ten theatrical trailers for films created by the fictional movie studio from Scream 3. Some of them are quite funny take-offs of popular horror films, while others are just plain stupid. All of them are presented Full Frame with Dolby Digital 2.0 sound.

Featurette - Scream 2

    Another extended promotional trailer, this seven-minute featurette is presented Full Frame with Dolby Digital 2.0 sound.

Music Video - Master P: Scream

    This three-minute music video is presented in Full Frame with Dolby Digital 2.0 sound. Other than that, the only thing I have to say about this music video that won't have the OFLC knocking on my door is "no comment".

Crew Biographies

    Biographies for director Wes Craven, producer Cathy Konrad, producer Marianne Maddalena, screenwriter Ehren Kruger (whom I am sure fans of the series would love to forget), and editor Patrick Lussier are provided under this sub-menu. The biographies are actually quite comprehensive and interesting, as well as easy to read.

Easter Egg - Scary Movie Trailer

    From the main menu, select the last blood dot on the screen and press enter. Playback of a Full Frame, Dolby Digital 2.0 trailer for a certain slasher spoof titled Scary Movie will then commence, and I can heartily recommend giving the film the once over, especially if you've actually seen the "wassup" commercials that are so hilariously taken off in one sequence.

DVD-ROM Extras - Trivia Game, Scripts, Character Web, Screensaver, Web Site

    Everyone knows what I personally think of DVD-ROM extras, so Michael took the time to take a look at this selection himself. All of the comments and opinions expressed in the following section are his and are not shared by me since I currently have no means of looking at the DVD-ROM extras, and have no intention of acquiring them.

DVD-ROM Extras

The DVD-ROM extras on this DVD are actually quite worthwhile, whilst at the same time not lessening the enjoyment of the rest of the extras disc for non DVD-ROM owners. This is probably the first time I have ever considered the DVD-ROM extras on a DVD to actually be more than just pointless filler.

Trivia Game

A very difficult and well-thought out trivia game kept me occupied for quite some time before I managed to get through all 10 questions. Well-and-truly a multimedia experience, a short clip from the movie plays and then you are asked a question with four possible answers. The questions get harder as you go along, and you are rewarded at the end with quite a lengthy video clip. Three incorrect answers and you have to start again.

Script Viewer

This contains the entire scripts for all three movies, along with multimedia links at various points throughout each script. I can't say that I did any more than glance through a few pages of each, but they would undoubtedly be of interest to budding filmmakers.

Character Web

This is a unusual extra. It consists of a screen with images of all of the characters from Scream, Scream 2, and Scream 3, linked together by coloured lines which indicate their respective relationships. Not overly useful, but certainly attractive and interesting to look at, at least for a while.

Screensaver

This uses footage from the DVD as a screensaver.

Website Archive

A mirror of the Scream 3 website.

Link to Website

A link to a Scream DVD website which promises future events for owners of the box set.

R4 vs R1

    Now that Region 4 and Region 1 both have a boxed set containing the entire Scream saga and a fourth disc full of extras, one would think we could call this one even, but the fact remains that Region 1 is well ahead on this deal by virtue of the fact that Screamis in its proper aspect ratio, even if there is no 16x9 Enhanced version outside of Japan.

Summary

    The Scream Screen Saga: Special Features is a collection of interesting special features that eventually add up to very little. Simply put, it isn't nearly enough to compensate for the joke of a transfer that the original, and by far the best film of the series, has been afforded.

    The overall video quality is excellent.

    The overall audio quality is excellent.

    The whole disc is an extra.
 
 

Ratings (out of 5)

Video sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sgh.gif (874 bytes)
Audio sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sgh.gif (874 bytes)
Extras sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)
Plot sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sgh.gif (874 bytes)
Overall sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sg.gif (100 bytes)sgh.gif (874 bytes)

© Dean McIntosh (my bio sucks... read it anyway)
December 29, 2000

Review Equipment
   
DVD Toshiba SD-2109, using S-video output
Display Samsung CS-823AMF (80 cm), calibrated using the NTSC DVD version of Video Essentials.
Audio Decoder Built In (Amplifier)
Amplification Sony STR-DE835, calibrated using the NTSC DVD version of Video Essentials.
Speakers Yamaha NS-45 Front Speakers, Yamaha NS-90 Rear Speakers, Yamaha NS-C120 Centre Speaker, JBL Digital 10 Active Subwoofer

Overall - Scream-Scream 2 - Scream 3 - Extras Disc