PLEASE NOTE: Michael D's is currently in READ ONLY MODE. Anything submitted will simply not be written to the database.
Lots of stuff is still broken, but at least reviews can now be looked up and read.
PLEASE NOTE: Michael D's is currently in READ ONLY MODE. Anything submitted will simply not be written to the database.
Lots of stuff is still broken, but at least reviews can now be looked up and read.
The Curse of Frankenstein (1957)

The Curse of Frankenstein (1957)

If you create a user account, you can add your own review of this DVD

Released 22-Oct-2002

Cover Art

This review is sponsored by
BUY IT

Details At A Glance

General Extras
Category Horror Main Menu Audio
Listing-Cast & Crew
Theatrical Trailer
Rating Rated M
Year Of Production 1957
Running Time 79:47
RSDL / Flipper No/No Cast & Crew
Start Up Menu
Region Coding 2,4 Directed By Terence Fisher
Studio
Distributor

Warner Home Video
Starring Peter Cushing
Hazel Court
Robert Urquhart
Christopher Lee
Case Gatefold
RPI Box Music James Bernard


Video Audio
Pan & Scan/Full Frame None English Dolby Digital 1.0 (192Kb/s)
French Dolby Digital 1.0 (192Kb/s)
German Dolby Digital 1.0 (192Kb/s)
Widescreen Aspect Ratio 1.78:1
16x9 Enhancement
16x9 Enhanced
Video Format 576i (PAL)
Original Aspect Ratio Unknown Miscellaneous
Jacket Pictures No
Subtitles English
French
German
Swedish
Danish
Norwegian
Greek
Turkish
Arabic
English for the Hearing Impaired
German for the Hearing Impaired
Smoking Yes
Annoying Product Placement No
Action In or After Credits No

NOTE: The Profanity Filter is ON. Turn it off here.

Plot Synopsis

    In 1949, a new production house came into being in England. It would build its reputation on quality budget films with a particular focus on the Horror genre. Still in existence today, it has been responsible for producing over two hundred films and television programs. Amongst these are some of my personal favourites, especially the early Quartermass films and in particular Quartermass And The Pit. They are also responsible for one of the most unusual horror combinations: The Legend of the 7 Golden Vampires where Peter Cushing's character is hunting vampires (of course) in China and is ably assisted in this by a group of Kung Fu experts.

    In 1957 they produced what I believe was their first Frankenstein film, The Curse Of Frankenstein, with Peter Cushing playing Baron Victor Frankenstein and Christopher Lee as the creature. In this version of the story we focus on the character of Frankenstein with the monster almost taking a back seat. He is a truly driven man that will stop at nothing to achieve his goals, including murder. The creature does not engender the pathos that some other versions of the story sometimes do - he is a damaged and dangerous creature from start to finish. The traditional scene showing the creature's human side is completely missing.

    This is not to say that this is not an excellent interpretation of the story, simply a bit different from the others. The sets are fantastic with a real gothic feel to the Baron's residence. The monster looks good for the 50s and is more seriously done than some versions, particularly those with bolts in their necks. We have the usual mad scientists lab with flashing lights, test tubes and lots of air lines for bubbles. Dry ice is also in regular use.

    As a foil to the horror in the film there is also some sexuality supplied by Hazel Court as Elizabeth. Her costumes are very regal and sensuous with wide skirts and low cut tops. Robert Urquhart plays Paul Krempe, initially the young Frankenstein's tutor and later his assistant. He does not approve of the experiments that Frankenstein is performing and tries to stop them from going forward.

    This is the first of three discs that make up the new box set Hammer Horror Collection. In this set we have this film along with Horror Of Dracula and The Mummy, all late fifties Hammer Horror productions.

Don't wish to see plot synopses in the future? Change your configuration.

Transfer Quality

Video

    The film master used for this transfer is nothing short of miraculous and is in near-perfect condition. I have given films of far less age than this allowances for their age - this film requires no allowance at all. As far as film artefacts are concerned this film could have been made yesterday.

    There is, however, a strange artefact during the scene changes. This film uses fades to move from one scene to another. While the fade is progressing, the image and colours are slightly brighter than normal. When the transition completes, the brightness and colour saturation drop slightly. This is a little distracting. I must assume that this is in the source material as I cannot think of a mechanism where MPEG processing could introduce such an artefact. An example of this is the red liquid in the beaker on the bench in the lab at 9:19.

    The film is presented at 1.78:1 and is 16x9 enhanced.

    The only real problem with this transfer is related to the sharpness. In general, the image is only reasonably sharp with some scenes better than others. I suspect that the low bit rate and higher-than-normal compression used in this transfer has had an effect on the sharpness, or the sharpness has been reduced via a filter to prevent pixelization. On the other hand, the original image may be to blame - it is difficult to judge with only the final transfer being available for viewing. Moving objects or backgrounds during pans are even less sharp. Black levels are good as is the shadow detail. There is only the most minuscule amount of low level noise, only visible in some scenes with a mid grey background.

    Colours are very good with no noise present at all. Skins tones are good for most of the film though there is the occasional scene where they appear a little washed out.

    Other than the effect on the sharpness there are no real visible MPEG artefacts. With the low bitrate I distrusted my initial impressions and examined many scenes very closely. The only problem I could find was some very minor posterization in the background which is nearly invisible. An example is the grey bricks in the background at 21:23. The film master as mentioned is in near-perfect condition with almost invisible grain and no other film artefacts.

    The subtitles are easy to read and reasonably accurate to the dialogue.

    This is a single layered disc.

Video Ratings Summary
Sharpness
Shadow Detail
Colour
Grain/Pixelization
Film-To-Video Artefacts
Film Artefacts
Overall

Audio

    There are three soundtracks on this disc, all Dolby Digital 1.0. The first and default is English, with German and French the other two. I found the soundtrack a little bright and thin and as a personal preference prefer mono sound tracks in Dolby Digital 2.0, although I understand the wish to avoid the Hass effect with the same signal coming from two speakers.

    Dialogue quality is excellent as is the audio sync.

    The music is wonderfully creepy and suits the film very well.

    There is no surround nor subwoofer activity.

Audio Ratings Summary
Dialogue
Audio Sync
Clicks/Pops/Dropouts
Surround Channel Use
Subwoofer
Overall

Extras

Menu

    Also presented at 1.78:1 and 16x9 enhanced, the menu consists of a static picture, I suspect from the original movie poster, accompanied by a Dolby Digital 2.0 underscore with the surround flag set. As this is a mono soundtrack, the effect is the same as the movie's Dolby Digital 1.0 soundtrack in that the entire audio appears in the centre speaker. This is my preference for mono as you can then choose to use either your mains or centre speaker.

Theatrical Trailer (2:16)

    Presented at 1.33:1 and 16x9 enhanced. The image is mail-slotted into the centre of the screen and accompanied by a Dolby Digital 1.0 soundtrack. The quality is not quite the same as the main feature with some grain visible and some brightness strobing present. It is the trailer you would expect from this era with the over-the-top voice-over and the creepy lettering appearing between scenes.

Cast and Crew

    A single page simply listing the cast and crew against a black and white image from the movie.

R4 vs R1

NOTE: To view non-R4 releases, your equipment needs to be multi-zone compatible and usually also NTSC compatible.

   While this box set has been released in the US, information on this release is extremely hard to come by. This film itself was also released separately from the set. That single release and the disc included in this set appear to be identical in content. Comparing reviews of the transfers of the single disc release would appear to be very similar, though the R1 might be a tad sharper overall, although I have not seen the R1 myself and cannot confirm this.

    I will call this an R4 winner unless further information comes to light as I really don't like NTSC 3:2 pulldown.

Summary

    I believe this to be one of the better versions of Frankenstein. A great cast has come together to tell the story in a character-driven way and it is truly creepy in parts. It is a great first film as part of this box set.

    The video is a little soft.

    The audio is a bit thin.

    Extras are a bit thin too.

Ratings (out of 5)

Video
Audio
Extras
Plot
Overall

© Terry McCracken (read my bio)
Tuesday, October 29, 2002
Review Equipment
DVDSkyworth 1050p progressive scan, using RGB output
DisplaySony 1252q CRT Projector, Screen Technics matte white screen 16:9 (223cm). Calibrated with AVIA Guide To Home Theatre. This display device is 16x9 capable.
Audio DecoderBuilt in to amplifier/receiver. Calibrated with AVIA Guide To Home Theatre.
AmplificationSony STR-DB1070
SpeakersB&W DM305 (mains); CC3 (centre); S100 (surrounds); custom Adire Audio Tempest with Redgum plate amp (subwoofer)

Other Reviews NONE