PLEASE NOTE: Michael D's is currently in READ ONLY MODE. Anything submitted will simply not be written to the database.
Lots of stuff is still broken, but at least reviews can now be looked up and read.
PLEASE NOTE: Michael D's is currently in READ ONLY MODE. Anything submitted will simply not be written to the database.
Lots of stuff is still broken, but at least reviews can now be looked up and read.
Chocolat (2000)

Chocolat (2000)

If you create a user account, you can add your own review of this DVD

Released 5-Dec-2001

Cover Art

This review is sponsored by
BUY IT

Details At A Glance

General Extras
Category Drama Menu Animation & Audio
Dolby Digital Trailer-Aurora
Audio Commentary
Featurette-Making Of
Featurette-The Costumes Of Chocolat
Deleted Scenes-7
Biographies-Cast & Crew
Trailer-The Wedding Planner; The English Patient
Theatrical Trailer
Rating Rated M
Year Of Production 2000
Running Time 116:39
RSDL / Flipper RSDL (78:10) Cast & Crew
Start Up Menu
Region Coding 4 Directed By Lasse Hallstrom
Studio
Distributor

Roadshow Home Entertainment
Starring Juliette Binoche
Judi Dench
Johnny Depp
Alfred Molina
Lena Olin
Carrie-Anne Moss
Hugh O'Conor
John Wood
Leslie Caron
Peter Stormare
Case Soft Brackley-Transp
RPI $34.95 Music Rachel Portman


Video Audio
Pan & Scan/Full Frame None English Dolby Digital 5.1 (448Kb/s)
English Audio Commentary Dolby Digital 2.0 (224Kb/s)
Widescreen Aspect Ratio 1.85:1
16x9 Enhancement
16x9 Enhanced
Video Format 576i (PAL)
Original Aspect Ratio 1.85:1 Miscellaneous
Jacket Pictures No
Subtitles English for the Hearing Impaired Smoking Yes
Annoying Product Placement No
Action In or After Credits No

NOTE: The Profanity Filter is ON. Turn it off here.

Plot Synopsis

    Chocolate is an interesting substance. I happen to be allergic to it, so I am observing from the outside, in an impartial way. I have noticed that chocolate seems to have a stronger effect on women than men (think - who among your acquaintances would kill for chocolate? All of them women? See?), but its appeal is near universal (I am a rare exception). It appeals to children (although their discrimination is undeveloped), and, unlike other confectionary, its appeal does not decline with age (although taste may become more discriminating). Some of my favourite aphorisms concern chocolate:

    Chocolat is set in a small village in France in 1959, but it could be almost any small village, almost any time, since the widespread introduction of chocolate (in case you didn't know, chocolat is the French spelling of chocolate). The central characters are mostly women (appropriate, given my theory...). We are introduced to the village with a sweeping aerial shot, and a narrator, who explains that the people of this village live dull, respectable, lives (well, she doesn't say it, but it is implied). The visuals are almost monochromatic, emphasising the monotony (from monotone - quite appropriate). Then a woman and her daughter arrive, bringing with them colour and life (their red cloaks stand out strongly).

    I will say absolutely nothing more about the plot. Part of the enjoyment of this movie is the delicate unfolding of the story. It follows a number of threads, which start at various times through the movie, and trace through to satisfying conclusions, again at different times. Don't try to anticipate what will happen. This is a delicacy that you must let melt in your mouth at its own pace - savour the texture and flavours as they appear. You will be gently surprised by some of the things you discover.

    This movie does not follow the book. There are very good reasons for this, and many of them are covered in the audio commentary. The result is a marvellous film, far better than it might have been had it followed the book slavishly. 

    There is a delicate balance of comedy and drama here, and I am delighted that a film from an American studio manages to keep that balance so beautifully. Perhaps the Scandinavian director and French and English actors helped a lot. It is very easy to see why Juliette Binoche was their first (and only) choice for Vianne. Indeed, they got their first choices for all of the main roles, which is unusual. Judi Dench is marvellous, as always; Alfred Molina is perfect; Lena Olin has a difficult role, and carries it off superbly; and Carrie-Anne Moss is very different from other roles, and very good. And the children, Victoire Thivisol and Aurelien Parent Koenig, excel. There are some extraordinary minor roles - Leslie Caron is delightful in a tiny role (I loved the story of their choreographer offering Leslie Caron some dance suggestions...) with John Wood.

    There are some amusing little side-pieces. Lena Olin happens to be married to Lasse Hallstrom, the director, and they have rarely had the chance to work together. Lena Olin worked with Juliette Binoche years before, and the first thing Juliette Binoche says to her is "good to see you again". Producer David Brown worked with Leslie Caron (and Fred Astaire) in Daddy Longlegs; this is the first film they have made since. And this is the first film in which Johnny Depp plays guitar on screen. Johnny Depp is one of the rare people who hates chocolate - when you see him apparently enjoying chocolate on screen, he's definitely acting. 

    Most importantly, do not let the suggestion that this is an "art" film put you off. I was a little reluctant, having viewed some unpleasant "art" films recently.

    The film is rated M, ostensibly for some coarse language (mostly from Judi Dench!). Even if you are sensitive to coarse language, I doubt you'll have any problem with this.

Don't wish to see plot synopses in the future? Change your configuration.

Transfer Quality

Video

    The picture is presented in an aspect ratio of 1.78:1. The theatrical ratio was 1.85:1 - a close match. It is 16x9 enhanced.

    The picture is a little soft, but beautifully clear. There is a lot of smoke used in exteriors and large interiors - this was a production design choice, and it makes some of the background very soft. Shadow detail is superb. There is no low-level noise.

    Colour is strong, where it is allowed to be - much of the colour is deliberately muted for effect. There are no traces of oversaturation or colour bleed.

    There are few film artefacts (I think I counted three, in all). There is quite a bit of aliasing, and more than a little moire. There is one moment of cross-colouration, and one strange scene in which Juliet Binoche's hair comes up blue - I think this is an MPEG artefact. None of these artefacts particularly detracts from the film. For reasons I suspect relate to the story I had a higher tolerance for these artefacts while watching this film.

    The only subtitles are English for the Hearing Impaired. They are white with a black border - easily read, well-timed and fairly accurate.

    The disc is single-sided and dual layered (RSDL-formatted). The layer change lies at 78:10, and is very obvious, being placed just before a cut, while the camera is focussed on a group of musicians. This is quite a poor placement.



Video Ratings Summary
Sharpness
Shadow Detail
Colour
Grain/Pixelization
Film-To-Video Artefacts
Film Artefacts
Overall

Audio

    There are two soundtracks, both in English. One is the soundtrack to the film, in Dolby Digital 5.1. The other is the audio commentary, in Dolby Digital 2.0 (not surround encoded).

    The dialogue is easy to understand, even with the trace French accents. There are no visible audio sync problems.

    Rachel Portman's score is perfect. There are some essential themes, carried through on carefully selected instruments. The "ethnic" flutes sound appropriately eerie; the cor anglais gives a deeply haunted feeling. She has enveloped (almost) every moment in music; she has even allowed silence at appropriate times.

    There are no directional sound effects, no gunshots, and no explosions. Why then would we have a 5.1 soundtrack? Because the score surrounds us, includes us, draws us into the film. This is the best example I've ever seen (err, heard) of a surround soundtrack being used for score. Delightful stuff.



Audio Ratings Summary
Dialogue
Audio Sync
Clicks/Pops/Dropouts
Surround Channel Use
Subwoofer
Overall

Extras

Menu

    The menus have animated backgrounds, and music from the score. They are easy to navigate.

Audio Commentary (Producers and Director)

    This is not an exciting commentary. It contains a lot of information, and there are few pauses, but it lacks something to make it truly interesting. It doesn't help that one of the speakers is significantly louder than the others, making you want to ride the volume control to try to keep a balance between audible and deafening.

    The speakers are the director, Lasse Hallstrom, and the producers: David Brown, Leslie Holleran, and Kit Golden.

Featurette: Making Of (26:25)

    A fairly typical "making of", complete with lots of mutual admiration, but still interesting, particularly in the discussions of the scoring. I was amused to see mention of the book "Why Women Need Chocolate". I'd recommend watching it. Presented in 1.33:1.

Featurette: Costumes of Chocolat (4:10)

    Detailed discussion of the thought that went into the costumes: matching the costumes to the period, to the people, and to the story. Presented in 1.33:1.

Deleted Scenes (6:47)

    Seven deleted scenes, presented in 1.78:1, not 16x9 enhanced, without any commentary or explanation as to why they were omitted.

Biographies

    There are several pages of biography for each person, followed by lists of films from most recent back.

Previews

    These are just trailers for The Wedding Planner (2:32, 1.78:1) and The English Patient (2:33, 1.33:1). The latter trailer is in quite poor condition, with lots of film artefacts.

Theatrical Trailer (2:08)

    Presented in 1.33:1, nothing special. 

R4 vs R1

NOTE: To view non-R4 releases, your equipment needs to be multi-zone compatible and usually also NTSC compatible.

    The Region 4 disc misses out on one small featurette, and some extra preview trailers. Not enough to make a difference, in my opinion. I don't think it will matter which of the two you buy - this is a pleasant film, nicely presented.

Summary

    Chocolat is a lightly sweet delight with a hint of bitterness and a pleasant lingering aftertaste. Presented nicely on DVD.

    The video quality is quite good.

    The audio quality is very good.

    The extras are extensive.

Ratings (out of 5)

Video
Audio
Extras
Plot
Overall

© Tony Rogers (bio-degrading: making a fool of oneself in a bio...)
Monday, November 12, 2001
Review Equipment
DVDArcam DV88, using Component output
DisplaySony VPH-G70 CRT Projector, QuadScan Elite scaler (Tripler), ScreenTechnics 110. Calibrated with Video Essentials. This display device is 16x9 capable.
Audio DecoderBuilt in to amplifier/receiver. Calibrated with Video Essentials.
AmplificationDenon AVC-A1SE
SpeakersFront Left and Right: Krix Euphonix, Centre: Krix KDX-C Rears: Krix KDX-M, Subwoofer: Krix Seismix 5

Other Reviews
Dark Horizons - Garth F
Web Wombat - James A
DVDAnswers - Pete R
The DVD Bits - Dean B
DVD Net - Amy F
Jeff K's Australian DVD Info Site - Kevin S
DVDownUnder - Matt G
DVD Plaza - Anthony C (read my bio)