PLEASE NOTE: Michael D's is currently in READ ONLY MODE. Anything submitted will simply not be written to the database.
Lots of stuff is still broken, but at least reviews can now be looked up and read.
PLEASE NOTE: Michael D's is currently in READ ONLY MODE. Anything submitted will simply not be written to the database.
Lots of stuff is still broken, but at least reviews can now be looked up and read.
Galgameth (1996)

Galgameth (1996)

If you create a user account, you can add your own review of this DVD

Released 21-Dec-2001

Cover Art

This review is sponsored by
BUY IT

Details At A Glance

General Extras
Category Childrens None
Rating Rated PG
Year Of Production 1996
Running Time 100:21
RSDL / Flipper No/No Cast & Crew
Start Up Programme
Region Coding 1,2,3,4,5,6 Directed By Sean McNamara
Studio
Distributor

Beyond Home Entertainment
Starring Davin Oatway
Sean McNamara
Stephen Macht
Elizabeth Cheap
Johna Stewart
Case Amaray-Transparent
RPI $14.95 Music Richard Marvin


Video Audio
Pan & Scan/Full Frame Full Screen, not known whether Pan & Scan or Full Frame English Dolby Digital 2.0 (224Kb/s)
Widescreen Aspect Ratio None
16x9 Enhancement No
Video Format 576i (PAL)
Original Aspect Ratio Unknown Miscellaneous
Jacket Pictures No
Subtitles None Smoking No
Annoying Product Placement No
Action In or After Credits No

NOTE: The Profanity Filter is ON. Turn it off here.

Plot Synopsis

    Galgameth bears a strong resemblance to a particular breed of Japanese monster movie - things like Godzilla, and that one with the flying turtle called a triphibian monster. It has the title of the movie being the name of the monster; it has the monster being a man in a rubber suit, and it has some of the most awful special effects I've ever seen. But unlike such Japanese monster movies it is completely lacking in charm. Heck, maybe most of the Japanese monster movies lack charm, too, and we only get to see the ones that manage to rise above the norm? Or maybe all this movie needs is a Japanese soundtrack and bad subtitles?

    Actually, this movie could do with several things: a plot, some actors, and decent props, to begin with. The swords are dreadful - you can clearly see that they have no edge and no point - just strips of flat steel (actually, I suspect that's not steel...). At one point the hero grabs the wrong end of a sword and strikes an opponent with the hilt. Try that with a real sword and you could do yourself some real harm, but it is no problem with these lousy props. And then there's the cannon (singular, not plural)... Clearly no one involved in this movie understands concepts like recoil, nor how long it takes to reload a muzzle-loading cannon, but the classic moment comes when the cannon stops firing for a while - the Chinese scientist in charge of the cannon takes a look at it and reports that it is "jammed". Words fail me!

    At one point the bad guys resort to firing rockets (not impossible - their cannon is the work of a Chinese specialist in gunpowder...). But their rockets are fired from what look like wooden recreations of the missile batteries you see on modern battleships - "anachronism" is the most generous term I can think of.

    There's a point in the plot which I find quite troubling: upon the death of his father, the boy prince (12 years old) is immediately referred to as "King Davin". This is unlikely - in reality a regent would normally be appointed until the boy reached his majority. There are several other holes, but that's the one that bugs me the most.

    There is an important moment early on where Galgameth meets what are supposed to be blackbirds. I guess the budget didn't stretch to real blackbirds - they appear to have used pigeons dyed black, and not very well, either. The budget didn't stretch to believable wine, either - the raspberry cordial they've used is very much the wrong colour.

    The screenwriter has drawn on all of his bag of clichés in concocting this mess. Pratfalls substitute for comedy. Corny dialogue could have been assembled as scraps from a variety of lousy movies, including pseudo-funny asides.

    Galgameth is intended, I suspect, for children. This movie trumpets itself as being "from the producers of The 3 Ninjas". Clearly these producers think that films for children need less attention to basics, like plot. Big mistake - children can be as critical as adults of holes in the plot. The children's films that succeed, in my opinion, pay more attention to good quality basics. They have credible plots and good acting.

    This film cannot have been cheap to make. It has a fair-sized cast, quite a few extras, not to mention a number of rubber suits and quite a bit of compositing. What a waste.

Don't wish to see plot synopses in the future? Change your configuration.

Transfer Quality

Video

    This film has been treated to a transfer far better than it deserves.

    This movie is presented in an aspect ratio of 1.33:1 and is not 16x9 enhanced; I don't know if this movie was made for TV, so that could be the original aspect ratio.

    The image is fairly sharp and clear in close-ups, but blurry in long shots. Shadow detail is good. There's no low level noise.

    Colour is strong and well-saturated. There are some moments of over-hot whites, but that's the only kind of oversaturation we see.

    There is quite a bit of aliasing, and a moment or two of moire. There are no visible MPEG errors, and few visible film artefacts.

    There are no subtitles.

    The disc is single-sided and single-layered, which means no layer change. A second layer is hardly required for the 100 minutes of movie and no extras.

Video Ratings Summary
Sharpness
Shadow Detail
Colour
Grain/Pixelization
Film-To-Video Artefacts
Film Artefacts
Overall

Audio

    There is a single soundtrack - English Dolby Digital 2.0 surround-encoded.

    Dialogue is easy to understand. There are no noticeable slips in audio sync.

    The score is from Richard Marvin. It is a summary of scores from bad movies - no originality required.

    There are no significant moments of directional sound, and the subwoofer switched itself off, indicating no noticeable signal.

Audio Ratings Summary
Dialogue
Audio Sync
Clicks/Pops/Dropouts
Surround Channel Use
Subwoofer
Overall

Extras

Menu

    The main menu is static and silent. The only entries on the menu are Play Movie and Chapter Selection.

R4 vs R1

NOTE: To view non-R4 releases, your equipment needs to be multi-zone compatible and usually also NTSC compatible.

    This movie appears only to have been released on VHS in Region 1.

Summary

    Galgameth is a poor movie, presently reasonably well on DVD.

    The video quality is mostly decent.

    The audio quality is fine.

    There are no extras.

Ratings (out of 5)

Video
Audio
Extras
Plot
Overall

© Tony Rogers (bio-degrading: making a fool of oneself in a bio...)
Friday, December 28, 2001
Review Equipment
DVDArcam DV88, using Component output
DisplaySony VPH-G70 CRT Projector, QuadScan Elite scaler (Tripler), ScreenTechnics 110. Calibrated with Video Essentials. This display device is 16x9 capable.
Audio DecoderBuilt in to amplifier/receiver. Calibrated with Video Essentials.
AmplificationDenon AVC-A1SE
SpeakersFront Left and Right: Krix Euphonix, Centre: Krix KDX-C Rears: Krix KDX-M, Subwoofer: Krix Seismix 5

Other Reviews
DVD Net - Gavin T